From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vandestreek v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Mar 17, 2015
Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00001-O (N.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00001-O

03-17-2015

MONIQUE VANDESTREEK, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 18. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted as the findings of the Court. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further consideration.

SO ORDERED on this 17th day of March, 2015.

/s/_________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Vandestreek v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Mar 17, 2015
Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00001-O (N.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Vandestreek v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:MONIQUE VANDESTREEK, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 17, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00001-O (N.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2015)

Citing Cases

Morris v. Saul

The ALJ was not required to make specific findings regarding Dr. Gleaves's report, or to address each aspect…

Morgan v. Kijakazi

Ultimately, the ALJ is not obligated to discuss every statement made within a doctor's opinion. See…