From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vandervall v. Feltner

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 26, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1576 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1576 GEB DAD P.

May 26, 2011


ORDER


On April 7, 2011, defendants Feltner and Machado filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.

Local Rule 230(1) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. . . ." On October 1, 2009, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion.

Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." In the order filed October 1, 2009, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: May 25, 2011.


Summaries of

Vandervall v. Feltner

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 26, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1576 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Vandervall v. Feltner

Case Details

Full title:KARL VANDERVALL, Plaintiff, v. J. FELTNER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1576 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)