From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 14, 2012
55 A.3d 1056 (Pa. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-14

Forester VANDERHOFF, Petitioner v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal, No. 375 MAL 2012, from the Order of the Superior Court.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 40 A.3d 744.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of November 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) What constitutes “actual prejudice” to relieve an insurance company of its obligation to pay insurance benefits to an insured?

(2) Should “actual prejudice” involve proof by an insurance carrier that it suffered a real material impairment of its ability to investigate and defend an uninsured claim?

(3) What constitutes a reasonable basis for a trial court finding that prejudice exists in a late report of a phantom vehicle?


Summaries of

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 14, 2012
55 A.3d 1056 (Pa. 2012)
Case details for

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Forester VANDERHOFF, Petitioner v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

55 A.3d 1056 (Pa. 2012)

Citing Cases

Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Ins. Co.

(3) What constitutes a reasonable basis for a trial court finding that prejudice exists in a late report of a…