From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanderberg v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 15, 2000
765 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 1D99-903

Opinion filed May 15, 2000

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County, John E. Crusoe, Judge.

Jack VanDerBerg, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.


The trial court should not have dismissed appellant's petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Vanderberg v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 15, 2000
765 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Vanderberg v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:JACK VANDERBERG, Appellant, v. MICHAEL W. MOORE, et al., Appellees

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 15, 2000

Citations

765 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)