From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vance v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 24, 1948
215 S.W.2d 169 (Tex. Crim. App. 1948)

Opinion

No. 24118.

November 24, 1948.

Evidence — Insufficient — Case Reversed.

Where evidence considered as a whole shows hardly a suspicious circumstance, the evidence will be held insufficient to sustain a conviction for contributing to the delinquency of a minor and the case reversed.

Contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County; penalty, fine of $200.00.

Hon. C. J. Matthews, Judge Presiding.

Reversed and remanded.

Herman G. Nami, of San Antonio, for appellant.

William N. Hensley, Criminal District Attorney, and Emmett J. Rahm, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, both of San Antonio, and Ernest S. Goens, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Appellant was convicted on a charge that he contributed to the delinquency of a minor. The fine is $200.00.

It would seem unfair to publish the facts brought to this Court in the record of the case as it is presented. They are not sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict of guilt. Considered as a whole and giving effect to the boy's statement, there is hardly a suspicious circumstance pointing to the guilt of the accused under the article of the statute involved.

Because of the insufficiency of the evidence the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.


Summaries of

Vance v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 24, 1948
215 S.W.2d 169 (Tex. Crim. App. 1948)
Case details for

Vance v. State

Case Details

Full title:HARRY VANCE v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 24, 1948

Citations

215 S.W.2d 169 (Tex. Crim. App. 1948)
215 S.W.2d 169