From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vance v. Dong Li

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 1997
241 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 28, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

In his affidavit, the plaintiff's treating physician indicated that, based on the physical examination he performed on the plaintiff more than three years after the accident, he found that the movement of the plaintiff's cervical spine was restricted by more than 20 degrees and that the movement of his lumbar spine was restricted by more than 20 per cent. The affidavit raised an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff suffered a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (cf., Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774; see, Petrone v. Thornton, 166 A.D.2d 513; Phillips v. Costa, 160 A.D.2d 855).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vance v. Dong Li

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 1997
241 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Vance v. Dong Li

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT VANCE, Appellant, v. DONG LI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 28, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 725

Citing Cases

Tam v. Magiropoulos

The plaintiff met his burden of demonstrating the existence of factual issues with respect to whether he…

Dialto v. Mirabito

Plaintiff's submissions, which reflect a cervical disc herniation and a causally related significant…