From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vance v. Evans

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1877
52 Cal. 93 (Cal. 1877)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Eighth Judicial District, County of Humboldt.

         COUNSEL

          Chamberlain & De Haven, for Vance.

         Buck and Stafford, for Evans.


         JUDGES: Rhodes, J. Mr. Chief Justice Wallace did not express an opinion.

         OPINION

          RHODES, Judge

         Contest for the purchase of the east half of section thirty-six, township seven north, range one east, Humboldt Meridian. The township was sectionized May 28th, 1873; the plat was approved August 14th, 1873; and was filed in the proper United States Land Office October 2nd, 1873. The defendant's first application for the purchase was filed May 30th, 1873; and the plaintiff's application was filed August 25th, 1873. The second application of the defendant was filed November 4th, 1874. The Court below dismissed the action, and both parties have appealed from the judgment.

         The Court had no jurisdiction of the defendant's second application, as it was filed after the order was made referring the contest to the District Court for determination. The only contests in respect to the right to purchase lands of which the District Courts have jurisdiction are those which arise in the Surveyor-General's or the Register's Office, and none had arisen in either of those offices concerning the defendant's second application.

         Neither of the other applications was sufficient, under the provisions of sec. 3408 of the Political Code; for the reason, among others, that neither applicant states that there is no claim to the land other than his own, as required by that section.


Summaries of

Vance v. Evans

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1877
52 Cal. 93 (Cal. 1877)
Case details for

Vance v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS VANCE v. DAVID EVANS

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1877

Citations

52 Cal. 93 (Cal. 1877)

Citing Cases

Youle v. Thomas

These conclusions are supported by previous decisions of this court. A similar question arose in Vance v.…

Peabody v. Prince

No new application could be entertained after the contest was referred. (Vance v. Evans , 52 Cal. 93;…