Vance v. Adams

Full title: DAVID A. VANCE, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Mar 18, 2011

EDCV 04-1515 JST (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2011)

Opinion

DAVID A. VANCE, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. No. EDCV 04-1515 JST (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. March 18, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.