From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Winkle v. Waterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1913
157 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

May, 1913.


Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs, including costs of this appeal. Held, that under the most favorable construction of the evidence and the findings of the trial court plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment of specific performance; that if any such contract was made she has an adequate remedy at law. All concurred.


Summaries of

Van Winkle v. Waterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1913
157 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

Van Winkle v. Waterman

Case Details

Full title:Cornelia Ann Van Winkle, Respondent, v. Elias Waterman and Minona…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1913

Citations

157 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)