From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Vo v. Gilmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 13, 2019
2:18-cv-01364-NR-MPK (W.D. Pa. Aug. 13, 2019)

Opinion

2:18-cv-01364-NR-MPK

08-13-2019

THUY VAN VO, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN, and STEPHEN DURCO, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly MEMORANDUM ORDER

This is a pro se prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules of Court applicable to Magistrate Judges.

Currently before the Court is [ECF 44] a Report & Recommendation filed by Judge Kelly on, recommending that the Court deny [ECF 30] Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), objections to the Report & Recommendation were due by August 7, 2019 (for ECF users) and August 12, 2019 (for non-ECF users). No objections were filed.

Upon a de novo review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds no clear error on the face of the record, and therefore enters the following order.

AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2019, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. The Report & Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ J. Nicholas Ranjan

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Van Vo v. Gilmore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 13, 2019
2:18-cv-01364-NR-MPK (W.D. Pa. Aug. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Van Vo v. Gilmore

Case Details

Full title:THUY VAN VO, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN, and STEPHEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 13, 2019

Citations

2:18-cv-01364-NR-MPK (W.D. Pa. Aug. 13, 2019)