From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Tuyn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1999
736 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-1429.

Opinion filed June 9, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Robert N. Scola, Jr., Judge, L.T. No. 86-34279.

Frederick C. Sake, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ.


REVISED OPINION

Based upon this court's decision in Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted, 722 So.2d 193 (Fla. 1998), the appellant's petition for writ of error coram nobis was properly denied. In so holding, we certify conflict with Gregersen v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, 728 So.2d 205 (Fla. 1998).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Van Tuyn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 9, 1999
736 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Van Tuyn v. State

Case Details

Full title:SABINA MARIA VAN TUYN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 9, 1999

Citations

736 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Van Tuyn v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review Van Tuyn v. State, 736 So.2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam…