Opinion
Argued March 14, 1894
Decided April 10, 1894
Frederic B. Jennings for appellant.
Artemas B. Smith for respondent.
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Van Tassel v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 10, 1894
142 N.Y. 634 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Van Tassel v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 10, 1894
142 N.Y. 634 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Van Tassel v. New York, Lake Erie and Western Rd. Co.
Case Details
Full title:JOHN VAN TASSEL, Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK, LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 10, 1894
Citations
142 N.Y. 634 (N.Y. 1894)
Citing Cases
Carroll v. Union R. Co.
The purpose for which the rung was being used was the purpose for which it was placed there. That surely is…