From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Tassel v. Midfirst Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 31, 2018
C.A. No. 17- 275 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2018)

Opinion

C.A. No. 17- 275 Erie

10-31-2018

MYRON L. VAN TASSEL, Plaintiff, v. MIDFIRST BANK, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Eddy MEMORANDUM ORDER

This action was commenced by the filing of a Complaint on October 16, 2017, against a number of named Defendants. On February 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint against Defendant MidFirst Bank only, and all other Defendants were voluntarily dismissed from this case. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On March 5, 2018, Defendant MidFirst Bank filed a motion to dismiss amended complaint [ECF No. 14]. On September 4, 2018, a magistrate judge's report and recommendation ("R&R") was issued [ECF No. 25] recommending that Defendant's motion to dismiss be granted and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. Service of the R&R was made on Plaintiff at his address of record, via first class United States mail. Objections to the R&R were originally due from Plaintiff by September 21, 2018, but the deadline was subsequently extended to October 22, 2018, by this Court's Order dated October 3, 2018. Nonetheless, Plaintiff has failed to file any objections.

On September 14, 2018, the undersigned was sworn in as a United States District Judge. This action was reassigned to this Court's docket on September 17, 2018. After de novo review of the motion and documents in this case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2018;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Defendant MidFirst Bank [ECF No. 14] is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Eddy, issued September 4, 2018 [ECF No. 25], is adopted as the opinion of the court.

/s/_________

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States District Judge cc: Cynthia Reed Eddy

U.S. Magistrate Judge

all parties of record


Summaries of

Van Tassel v. Midfirst Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 31, 2018
C.A. No. 17- 275 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Van Tassel v. Midfirst Bank

Case Details

Full title:MYRON L. VAN TASSEL, Plaintiff, v. MIDFIRST BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

C.A. No. 17- 275 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2018)