From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Sickle v. Finander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2017
2:15-CV-07865 JAK JPR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2017)

Opinion

2:15-CV-07865 JAK JPR

03-27-2017

JAMES VAN SICKLE, Plaintiff, v. PAULETTE FINANDER, JUNAID FITTER, SUSAN MORRIS, K. BEECJ, & R. WARREN, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to the Court's Order dated March 6, 2017, issued at the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants, Paulette Finander and Susan Morris, IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: March 27, 2017

/s/_________

John A. Kronstadt

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Van Sickle v. Finander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2017
2:15-CV-07865 JAK JPR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Van Sickle v. Finander

Case Details

Full title:JAMES VAN SICKLE, Plaintiff, v. PAULETTE FINANDER, JUNAID FITTER, SUSAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2017

Citations

2:15-CV-07865 JAK JPR (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2017)