VAN RAAS v. ROSENBAUM-GRINELL, INC

Full title: RHYISSA VAN RAAS, Respondent, v. ROSENBAUM-GRINELL, INC., Appellant

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1960

23 Misc. 2d 919 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

206 N.Y.S.2d 235

Opinion

February 4, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, JOSEPH B. RAFFERTY, J.

Simon S. Katz for appellant.

Monroe J. Winsten and Albert A. Juron for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was not entitled to recover the item of $37.50 for advertising costs for a new position, since, in any event, same might have been incurred in advertising for a new position when her employment terminated at the end of the stated season, in December.

The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $780, with interest and costs thereon and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to plaintiff-respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.