From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Quang v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2018
Case No. 8:16-cv-01086-PA-KES (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 8:16-cv-01086-PA-KES

03-27-2018

THANH VAN QUANG, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition (Dkt. 22), the other records on file herein, the initial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 33), and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 36). No objections to the initial Report and Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the First amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: March 27, 2018

/s/_________

PERCY ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Van Quang v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2018
Case No. 8:16-cv-01086-PA-KES (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Van Quang v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:THANH VAN QUANG, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2018

Citations

Case No. 8:16-cv-01086-PA-KES (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2018)