From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Poperin v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 24, 2012
Case No. 10-11110 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 10-11110

02-24-2012

GARY VAN POPERIN and EUGENE N. HARGRAVE, Plaintiffs, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant.


Hon: AVERN COHN


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 27)

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This is an employment discrimination case. The parties shall proceed with discovery consistent with the Court's instructions as stated on the record at the hearing held on February 23, 2012. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. 27) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, Friday, February 24, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Julie Owens

Case Manager


Summaries of

Van Poperin v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 24, 2012
Case No. 10-11110 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Van Poperin v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

Case Details

Full title:GARY VAN POPERIN and EUGENE N. HARGRAVE, Plaintiffs, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

Case No. 10-11110 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 24, 2012)