From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Orden v. Aramark Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00047-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00047-WYD-BNB

02-11-2013

CHRISTIE VAN ORDEN, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK CORP., Defendant.


Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice (ECF No. 30), filed February 11, 2013. After carefully reviewing the above-captioned case, I find that the motion should be granted and that this case should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 41(a). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED. In accordance therewith, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

Wiley Y. Daniel

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Van Orden v. Aramark Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00047-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Van Orden v. Aramark Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIE VAN ORDEN, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK CORP., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00047-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 11, 2013)