From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VAN KAN v. MATTHEUS

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Geauga County
Jun 30, 1999
No. 98-G-2139 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 30, 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-G-2139

June 30, 1999


Judgment affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part. See Opinion and Judgment Entry. [NADER] (FORD) (O'NEILL)

CHILD CUSTODY/UCCJA:

The word "home state" used in Ohio's UCCJA does not apply to foreign countries. Thus, South Africa cannot be considered the child's home state when applying the UCCJA. Appellant, further, failed to demonstrate that, even if South Africa were to be considered as a possible home state, the trial court erred by determining that Ohio was the proper forum for the instant child custody dispute.

CHILD SUPPORT/WORKSHEET:

A trial court is without discretion to award child support without completing a child support worksheet pursuant to R.C 3113.215.

PERSONAL JURISDICTION/FRAUDULENT SERVICE:

Appellant failed to meet his burden to prove that appellee fraudulently induced him within the court's reach to serve him.


Summaries of

VAN KAN v. MATTHEUS

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Geauga County
Jun 30, 1999
No. 98-G-2139 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 30, 1999)
Case details for

VAN KAN v. MATTHEUS

Case Details

Full title:HEIDI VAN KAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALAN MATTHEUS, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Geauga County

Date published: Jun 30, 1999

Citations

No. 98-G-2139 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 30, 1999)

Citing Cases

Crandall v. Crandall

{¶108} It is well established that "[c]hildren have a right to expect the same support and care they would…

Burke v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Courts have held, in a variety of cases, that parties cannot "contract away" statutory obligations. See Van…