From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Hoozer v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jul 16, 2018
Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-1306-CLS (N.D. Ala. Jul. 16, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-1306-CLS

07-16-2018

JENNIFER VAN HOOZER, Claimant, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The magistrate judge filed a report on June 15, 2018, recommending that this court should affirm the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to deny claimant's claim for supplemental security income benefits. Claimant filed objections to the report and recommendation, and the Commissioner filed a reply to claimant's objections.

Doc. no. 15 (Report and Recommendation).

Doc. no. 16.

Doc. no. 18. --------

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court concludes that the Commissioner's decision was supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with applicable legal standards. Accordingly, claimant's objections are OVERRULED. The magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Costs are taxed against claimant. The Clerk is directed to close this file.

DONE this 16th day of July, 2018.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Van Hoozer v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jul 16, 2018
Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-1306-CLS (N.D. Ala. Jul. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Van Hoozer v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER VAN HOOZER, Claimant, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 16, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-1306-CLS (N.D. Ala. Jul. 16, 2018)