From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Duyn v. SPX Flow, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-00862-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00862-MCE-CKD

12-13-2021

NICHOLAS ANTHONY VAN DUYN, Plaintiff, v. SPX FLOW, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Having reviewed the record in this case in this entirety, the Court concludes it lacks jurisdiction over the action because the parties are not diverse as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to REMAND this action to the Yolo County Superior Court. Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (ECF No. 6) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Van Duyn v. SPX Flow, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-00862-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Van Duyn v. SPX Flow, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS ANTHONY VAN DUYN, Plaintiff, v. SPX FLOW, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00862-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)