Summary
In Van Buren v. Wells, 53 Ark. 377, [22 Am. St. Rep. 214, 14 S.W. 38], it was held that the burden of proving publication was not placed upon the person asserting a right under the statute, but upon the one denying its validity.
Summary of this case from The Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. JurgensOpinion
No. 4D13–429.
2014-04-10
Ryan E. VAN BUREN and Eve I. Van Buren, Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N .A., Appellee.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312010CA010010. D. John Rhodeback and J. Garry Rooney of Rooney & Rooney, P.A., Vero Beach, for appellant. Todd A. Armbruster of Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.