From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Bramer v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 18, 2002
293 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90460

Decided and Entered: April 18, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Robert Van Bramer, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT


Inasmuch as the service of process on the Attorney-General authorized by the order to show cause was insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over respondent, Supreme Court erred in denying respondent's objection in point of law based on the improper service (see, Matter of Standifer v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 912; Matter of Taylor v. Poole, 285 A.D.2d 769). Contrary to Supreme Court, we find nothing of substance in this case to distinguish it from our prior cases which rejected this method of service. We also find no merit to the Attorney-General's argument that petitioner is somehow at fault for the improper service directed by Supreme Court's order to show cause. The appropriate remedy is to reverse the order of transfer and remit the matter to Supreme Court for the execution of an order to show cause which provides for proper service, and we also direct that the time for service of the papers be extended to a new date designated by the court upon remittal (see, id.).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the order of transfer is reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.


Summaries of

Van Bramer v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 18, 2002
293 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Van Bramer v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT VAN BRAMER, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 18, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
740 N.Y.S.2d 249

Citing Cases

Stephens v. N.Y. St. Executive Bd. of Parole

In that case, despite orders drafted by the petitioner which sought to effectuate service both on the…

Hanson v. State

Applying these provisions, both state and federal courts have held that service upon an assistant attorney…