d be unjust"); Adams v. SCME Mortgage Bankers, Inc., No. CV F 09-0501 LJO SMS, 2009 WL 1451715, *13 (E.D. Cal. May 22, 2009) ("Under the circumstances here, an award of fees and costs is unjust, especially given Ms. Adams' inability to pay her mortgage"); see also Cruz v. Wachovia Mortg., 775 F.Supp.2d 1188, 1191 (C.D. Cal. 2011) ("Plaintiffs are already facing the loss of their home. To saddle them with nearly $20,000 in attorneys' fees sought by a giant financial institution merely because they had the temerity to file a lawsuit would be worse than inequitable and unreasonable; it would be a travesty"); Dubinskiy v. Aurora Loan Services , No. CIV-F-10-0735 AWI GSA, 2011 WL 3584720, *2 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2011) ("These cases brought by homeowners seeking to stave off foreclosure are unhappy affairs for all involved. Under the circumstances here, an award of fees and costs is unjust, especially given [plaintiff's] inability to pay her mortgage" (citation and quotation marks omitted)); Valtierra v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:10-cv-849-AWI-MJS, 2010 WL 5288670, *1 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2010) ("[T]he fact the Plaintiff lost his home to foreclosure leaves it obvious to the Court that Plaintiff is not financially sound. Considering all of these circumstances, the Court finds that it would be unjust to impose an attorney's fees award on Plaintiff").