From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valor LLP v. Karamooz

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 6, 2024
CV 24-02558-SPG-E (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-02558-SPG-E

05-06-2024

Valor LLP v. Saeed Karamooz et al


Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before May 20, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendant Saeed Karamooz did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Valor LLP v. Karamooz

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 6, 2024
CV 24-02558-SPG-E (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Valor LLP v. Karamooz

Case Details

Full title:Valor LLP v. Saeed Karamooz et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 6, 2024

Citations

CV 24-02558-SPG-E (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2024)