From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valliappan v. Cruz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 5, 2004
871 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 4D03-2283.

Opinion filed May 5, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Thomas M. Lynch, IV, Judge, L.T. Case No. 02-002796 (11).

Jason A. Dvoracek of Koppen, Watkins, Partners Associates, Delray Beach, for appellant.

Todd S. Payne and Eric T. Salpeter of Zebersky Payne, LLP, Hollywood, for Appellee-Victor Vincente Cruz.


We reverse an order denying Jodhi Valliappan's motion to set aside a default judgment. There is no proof in the record that Cruz served Valliappan with process by registered or certified mail, as required by the substituted service provisions of section 48.161, Florida Statutes. Section 48.161 allows substituted service in this matter upon a non-resident or a person concealing his whereabouts, provided the plaintiff sends notice of service and a copy of the process by registered or certified mail to the defendant, files the return receipt, and files an affidavit stating compliance. § 48.161, Fla. Stat. (2003).

The record reflects that, after serving the Secretary of State, Cruz failed to mail Valliappan a copy of the complaint and summons by registered or certified mail. Because due process requires strict compliance with the statutory requirements, we remand for further proceedings. See Monaco v. Nealon, 810 So.2d 1084, 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); see also Wyatt v. Haese, 649 So.2d 905, 906 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

All other issues raised are moot.

STONE, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Valliappan v. Cruz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 5, 2004
871 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Valliappan v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:JODHI VALLIAPPAN, Appellant, v. VICTOR VICENTE CRUZ, OFF-SHORE AVIATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 5, 2004

Citations

871 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Wise v. Warner

"Because the statute allowing substituted service is an exception to the general rule requiring a defendant…

ARDT v. AMERICA'S SENIOR FIN. SERV

In their affidavit defendants stated that none of them had been located at the address at which the deputy…