From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vallian v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Aug 17, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-1739 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-1739.

August 17, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION


This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on July 25, 2011 and has made a de novo determination of the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). No objections have been filed. This court finds that the Memorandum and Recommendation should be, and is, adopted as this court's Memorandum and Order. This court grants the defendant's motion for summary judgment and denies the plaintiff's motion. This court finds that the Administrative Law Judge's decision that K.E.S., the plaintiff's daughter, is not disabled is supported by substantial evidence and was consistent with the applicable law. Final judgment dismissing this suit is entered by separate order.


Summaries of

Vallian v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Aug 17, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-1739 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Vallian v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SHEILA VALLIAN, on behalf of K.E.S., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Aug 17, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-1739 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 17, 2011)

Citing Cases

Guardian v. Kijakazi

(S.D. Tex. July 26, 2011), report and recommendation adopted sub nom. Vallian v. Astrue, Civil Action …