From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valleau v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Dec 6, 1882
62 Cal. 290 (Cal. 1882)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Application for writ of mandamus to Chas. Halsey, Judge of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.

         COUNSEL

          Severance, Travers & Hornblower, for Plaintiff.

         Geo. D. Shadbourne, for Defendant.


         OPINION

         The Court:

         This is an application for a writ of mandamus, to compel the respondent, who is a Judge of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, to settle a statement on appeal to this Court. Several reasons are assigned for the refusal of the Judge to settle the statement, only one of which will be noticed, as that is sufficient to sustain the respondent's action in the case.

         The proposed statement is made up of the reporter's notes, taken at the trial and written out in long hand. This is not the proper manner in which a bill of exceptions, or statement on appeal, should be prepared, and we will not sanction such a practice. It has been justly condemned in several cases (People v. Getty , 49 Cal. 584; Caldwell v. Parks , 50 id. 502), and this case comes within the rule therein laid down.

         Writ denied.


Summaries of

Valleau v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Dec 6, 1882
62 Cal. 290 (Cal. 1882)
Case details for

Valleau v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE R. VALLEAU v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 6, 1882

Citations

62 Cal. 290 (Cal. 1882)