From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valle v. Vergara-Gonzalez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 8, 2015
No. 65324 (Nev. Dec. 8, 2015)

Opinion

No. 65324

12-08-2015

LUZ DIZON VALLE, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellant, v. ALMA VERGARA-GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY; ROBERTO CALDERON, INDIVIDUALLY; AND GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

On August 28, 2015, this court entered an order reinstating briefing on an expedited basis and directing appellant to file the transcript request form within 7 days and the opening brief within 30 days. See NRAP 9(a). Appellant failed to comply with the order; accordingly on October 22, 2015, we entered a second order directing appellant to file and serve the transcript request form within 5 days and the opening brief and appendix within 15 days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the required documents would result in the imposition of sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this appeal. See NRAP 9(a)(6); NRAP 31(d). To date, appellant has failed to file the documents or otherwise communicate with this court. Accordingly, we conclude that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge

Eva Garcia-Mendoza, Settlement Judge

Fassett & Cardoza

Law Offices of Katherine M. Barker

Ratzel & Associates, LLC

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Valle v. Vergara-Gonzalez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 8, 2015
No. 65324 (Nev. Dec. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Valle v. Vergara-Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:LUZ DIZON VALLE, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellant, v. ALMA VERGARA-GONZALEZ…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 8, 2015

Citations

No. 65324 (Nev. Dec. 8, 2015)