From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valle v. Evans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 19, 2009
No. CIV S-09-1467 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1467 FCD GGH P.

August 19, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's August 12, 2009, request for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 19) is denied.


Summaries of

Valle v. Evans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 19, 2009
No. CIV S-09-1467 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Valle v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:PABLO CHINA VALLE, Petitioner, v. M.S. EVANS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 19, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1467 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)