From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vallam v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 26, 2022
No. 4318-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 26, 2022)

Opinion

4318-21S

01-26-2022

Ram Prashanth Vallam, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Diana L. Leyden Special Trial Judge

On December 30, 2021, respondent's counsel, Thomas R. Mackinson, filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (motion). Petitioner's views on the granting of the motion were unknown. By Order served January 3, 2022, the Court directed petitioner, on or before January 18, 2022, to file an objection or other response to respondent's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. Petitioner did not file a response.

For cause, it is

ORDERED that the above-referenced motion is granted, and Thomas R. Mackinson is withdrawn as counsel for respondent.


Summaries of

Vallam v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 26, 2022
No. 4318-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Vallam v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Ram Prashanth Vallam, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 26, 2022

Citations

No. 4318-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 26, 2022)