From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vallam v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 3, 2022
No. 4318-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

4318-21S

01-03-2022

Ram Prashanth Vallam, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent


ORDER

Diana L. Leyden Special Trial Judge

On December 30, 2021, respondent's counsel, Thomas R. Mackinson, filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (motion). The motion states that Thomas R. Mackinson is retiring from the Office of Chief Counsel. Petitioner's views on the granting of this motion are unknown. Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that, on or before January 18, 2022, petitioner shall file an objection or other response to respondent's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel.


Summaries of

Vallam v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 3, 2022
No. 4318-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Vallam v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Ram Prashanth Vallam, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

Citations

No. 4318-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)