From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valerga v. Ash

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 14, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01316-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01316-MSK-BNB.

December 14, 2010


ORDER


This matter arises on a document captioned Amended Complaint [Doc. # 23, filed 12/6/2010] from the plaintiff. I will construe the document as a motion for leave to amend, and I will refer to it as the "Motion." The Motion is DENIED.

The Motion indicates that the plaintiff seeks to join the City of Thornton as a defendant. No amended complaint is submitted, however. To seek leave to amend, the plaintiff must submit a motion to amend describing generally the amendments requested and the grounds for those amendments, and must attach as an exhibit to the motion a proposed amended complaint that contains all claims against all parties which the plaintiff seeks to assert. The amended complaint cannot incorporate or rely on a previous complaint.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Doc. # 23 is construed as a motion to amend; and
(2) The Motion [Doc. # 23] is DENIED.

Dated December 14, 2010.


Summaries of

Valerga v. Ash

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 14, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01316-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Valerga v. Ash

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIO A. VALERGA, Plaintiff, v. NEAL ASH, Detective, and JOHN DOE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 14, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01316-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 14, 2010)