From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valera v. California Supreme Court

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 4, 2008
No. C 05-02568 JSW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 05-02568 JSW (PR).

March 4, 2008


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER (Docket No. 9)


On July 20, 2007, Respondent filed a motion for an extension of time to file its answer, and sought an extension of time until September 18, 2007. On September 27, 2007, Respondent filed an answer. No traverse has been filed, and the docket indicates that Petitioner may have been transferred shortly after the answer was filed.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the request for an extension of time is granted nunc pro tunc to September 27, 2007, and the Answer (Docket 10) shall be deemed timely filed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent is directed to re-serve Petitioner with the answer at his current address ( see Docket 12) and to file proof of such service with the Court.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's traverse shall be due no later than thirty (30) days after re-service of the Answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Valera v. California Supreme Court

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 4, 2008
No. C 05-02568 JSW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Valera v. California Supreme Court

Case Details

Full title:ROMMEL B. VALERA, Petitioner v. CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 4, 2008

Citations

No. C 05-02568 JSW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2008)