From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valenzuela v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2020
Case No. CV 19-7559-CJC (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. CV 19-7559-CJC (KK)

04-30-2020

RAUL CERVANTES VALENZUELA, Plaintiff, v. V. TORRES, ET AL., Defendant(s).


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the (a) Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Villalobos and (b) Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Torres are dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. /// /// /// ///

The Court will issue a separate order regarding service of the sole remaining claim in the Second Amended Complaint alleging an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Moisa in his individual capacity. Dated: April 30, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Valenzuela v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2020
Case No. CV 19-7559-CJC (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Valenzuela v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:RAUL CERVANTES VALENZUELA, Plaintiff, v. V. TORRES, ET AL., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 30, 2020

Citations

Case No. CV 19-7559-CJC (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2020)