From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valenzuela v. Santoro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2016
Case No. CV 15-01163 FMO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-01163 FMO (RAO)

09-20-2016

MIGUEL VALENZUELA, Petitioner, v. KELLY SANTORO, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Second Amended Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: September 20, 2016

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Valenzuela v. Santoro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2016
Case No. CV 15-01163 FMO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Valenzuela v. Santoro

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL VALENZUELA, Petitioner, v. KELLY SANTORO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-01163 FMO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)