From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valenzuela v. Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 3, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-00174-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-00174-HDM-VPC.

December 3, 2010

Mark Mausert, Reno, NV, Attorney for Plaintiff, ANITA VALENZUELA.

McDONALD CARANO WILSON LLP, Miranda Du, Megan Starich, McDonald Carano Wilson LLP, Reno, NV, Attorneys for Defendant, OAK HARBOR FREIGHT LINES, INC.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, stipulate to dismiss with prejudice any and all claims in the above-captioned matter, with each party to pay its/her own attorney's fees, costs and expenses.


ORDER

The parties' stipulation is GRANTED. The jury trial set for Tuesday, January 4, 2011 is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 3, 2010.


Summaries of

Valenzuela v. Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 3, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-00174-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Valenzuela v. Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANITA VALENZUELA, Plaintiff, v. OAK HARBOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., and DOES…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 3, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-00174-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 3, 2010)