From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valenzuela v. Nev. Bd. of Parole Comm'rs

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2019
No. 77403-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 13, 2019)

Opinion

No. 77403-COA

02-13-2019

SAMUEL VALENZUELA, III, Petitioner, v. NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks an order directing the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners to reverse its denial of Samuel Valenzuela, III's request for reconsideration of imposed parole conditions. Valenzuela claims the Board has improperly imposed the parole conditions set forth in NRS 213.1245 against him in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. We have considered the petition, and we are not satisfied this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted at this time. See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merit of the claim raised, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, A.C.J.

Douglas /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Samuel Valenzuela, III

Attorney General/Carson City


Summaries of

Valenzuela v. Nev. Bd. of Parole Comm'rs

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2019
No. 77403-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 13, 2019)
Case details for

Valenzuela v. Nev. Bd. of Parole Comm'rs

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL VALENZUELA, III, Petitioner, v. NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 13, 2019

Citations

No. 77403-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 13, 2019)