From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valentin v. Valentin

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jul 1, 1949
92 Cal.App.2d 697 (Cal. Ct. App. 1949)

Opinion

Docket No. 14002.

July 1, 1949.

MOTION to augment record on appeal. Motion granted.

Lelia R. Leep for Appellant.

Ferriter Purcell for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] Appellant's motion to augment the record is granted and the clerk of the superior court is directed to forward to the clerk of this court the following documents:

Affidavit for writ of execution to issue, filed March 22, 1948;

Writ of Execution issued thereon by the Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the City and County of San Francisco, and the Return of the Sheriff of said County endorsed thereon;

Notice of Motion for Reappraisement, filed April 19, 1948.

It further appearing that one or more of such documents may be lost or destroyed as to any such document this order is conditioned upon the appellant proceeding pursuant to section 1045, Code of Civil Procedure to secure an order from the superior court authorizing the use of a copy thereof.


Summaries of

Valentin v. Valentin

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jul 1, 1949
92 Cal.App.2d 697 (Cal. Ct. App. 1949)
Case details for

Valentin v. Valentin

Case Details

Full title:NINA VALENTIN, Appellant, v. MARCELINO VALENTIN, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Jul 1, 1949

Citations

92 Cal.App.2d 697 (Cal. Ct. App. 1949)
207 P.2d 880