From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valentin v. Moses

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Oct 26, 2020
NO. 2020 CW 0633 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 2020 CW 0633

10-26-2020

MELODY VALENTIN v. JAMARKUS D. MOSES


In Re: Jamarkus D. Moses, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 2020-141. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., WELCH AND CHUTZ, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator's writ application contains a number of violations of Rule 4-5 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, namely, the lack of the exception of prescription filed by respondent, any opposition thereto filed by relator, and all pertinent court minutes, violations of Rule 4-5(C)(8)(9) & (10). Moreover, relator failed to file his writ application within the return date set by the district court, a violation of Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.

Supplementation of this writ application and/or application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4-9 and 2-18.7.

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, the missing items noted above, all documents necessary to prove the timeliness of this application, and must comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.2. Any new application must be filed no later than November 30, 2020, and must contain a copy of this ruling.

VGW

JEW

Chutz, J., dissents and would deny the writ application. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

Valentin v. Moses

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Oct 26, 2020
NO. 2020 CW 0633 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Valentin v. Moses

Case Details

Full title:MELODY VALENTIN v. JAMARKUS D. MOSES

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 26, 2020

Citations

NO. 2020 CW 0633 (La. Ct. App. Oct. 26, 2020)