From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valente v. New York City Indus. Dev. Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 27, 1998
252 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

After the parties failed to appear at a status conference, the Supreme Court marked the case off its calendar. Thereafter, the plaintiff waited approximately eight years to make the instant motion to restore. Since the plaintiff failed to demonstrate either a meritorious cause of action or a reasonable excuse for his delay, we find that the Supreme Court did not err in denying the plaintiffs motion (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Lake Claire Homeowners Assn. v. Rosenberg, 245 A.D.2d 427; Arthur v. City of Yonkers, 237 A.D.2d 474).

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Valente v. New York City Indus. Dev. Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 27, 1998
252 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Valente v. New York City Indus. Dev. Agency

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS J. VALENTE, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 27, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 310

Citing Cases

Stabile v. Gomez

The court properly denied their motion, in effect, to vacate the default in appearing at the conference and…