Opinion
2:21-cv-00133-RFB-EJY
01-27-2022
CESAR VALENCIA, Plaintiff, v. JASON MARGOLIS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Richard F. Boulware, II United States District Judge
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] of the Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered September 22, 2021.
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review, ” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by October 6, 2021. No. objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. . . .
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.