From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valencia v. Jaime

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2020
CASE NO. ED CV 19-374-VBF (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. ED CV 19-374-VBF (PJW)

04-29-2020

JOSE ALBERTO VALENCIA, Petitioner, v. GEORGE JAIME, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). DATED: April 29, 2020

/s/_________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Valencia v. Jaime

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2020
CASE NO. ED CV 19-374-VBF (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Valencia v. Jaime

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ALBERTO VALENCIA, Petitioner, v. GEORGE JAIME, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. ED CV 19-374-VBF (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2020)