From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valencia v. Baughman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2016
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-06131-JVS (SK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-06131-JVS (SK)

10-25-2016

JOSEPH RICHARD VALENCIA JR., Petitioner, v. DAVID BAUGHMAN, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed, and this action dismissed. DATED: October 25, 2016

Petitioner consented to U.S. Magistrate Jurisdiction for all proceedings in this case (ECF No. 2), and Respondent's consent is not required because Respondent has not been served. See Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1119-21 (9th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge may order entry of judgment in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). --------

/s/_________

HON. STEVE KIM

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Valencia v. Baughman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2016
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-06131-JVS (SK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Valencia v. Baughman

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH RICHARD VALENCIA JR., Petitioner, v. DAVID BAUGHMAN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 25, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 2:16-CV-06131-JVS (SK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2016)