From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valence Technology, Inc. v. Berry

U.S.
Nov 29, 1999
528 U.S. 1019 (1999)

Summary

setting forth the factors for determining whether to count together the employees of affiliated corporations for the purposes of section 2000e

Summary of this case from Stinnett v. Iron Works Gym/Executive Health Spa, Inc.

Opinion

No. 99-476.

November 29, 1999.


C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 175 F. 3d 699.


Summaries of

Valence Technology, Inc. v. Berry

U.S.
Nov 29, 1999
528 U.S. 1019 (1999)

setting forth the factors for determining whether to count together the employees of affiliated corporations for the purposes of section 2000e

Summary of this case from Stinnett v. Iron Works Gym/Executive Health Spa, Inc.

dismissing claims against former CEO and holding that in absence of any allegations that he had continued operational involvement in the company, former CEO could not be held liable for statements made after his retirement

Summary of this case from D.E. J Limited Partnership v. Conaway
Case details for

Valence Technology, Inc. v. Berry

Case Details

Full title:VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC., ET AL. v. BERRY ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 29, 1999

Citations

528 U.S. 1019 (1999)

Citing Cases

State Farm Fire Cas. Co. v. Barnett, Inc.

Relator failed to demonstrate that the exercise of jurisdiction over it would be unreasonable in light of…

Leger v. ICL America Ltd.

This “purposeful availment” must be such that the defendant “should reasonably anticipate being haled into…