From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valeda Co. v. AMF Bruns Am., L.P.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 22, 2022
5:21-cv-2392 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 22, 2022)

Opinion

5:21-cv-2392

04-22-2022

VALEDA COMPANY, LLC, PLAINTIFF, v. AMF BRUNS AMERICA, L.P., DEFENDANT.


ORDER

HONORABLE SARA LIOI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) of Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Henderson with respect to defendant's emergency motion to modify preliminary injunction. (See Doc. No. 21.) Due to the urgent nature of the motion, and at the recommendation of the magistrate judge in her written order, the Court ordered that any objections be filed by 12:00 noon on April 22, 2022. None have been filed.

The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

For the reasons in the report and recommendation, which the Court has reviewed and now accepts, defendant's emergency motion to modify the preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 21) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Valeda Co. v. AMF Bruns Am., L.P.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 22, 2022
5:21-cv-2392 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Valeda Co. v. AMF Bruns Am., L.P.

Case Details

Full title:VALEDA COMPANY, LLC, PLAINTIFF, v. AMF BRUNS AMERICA, L.P., DEFENDANT.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 22, 2022

Citations

5:21-cv-2392 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 22, 2022)