From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vale v. Sabol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 11, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-2249 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-2249

02-11-2016

CARLOS BASTARDO VALE, Petitioner v. MARY SABOL, Warden of York County Prison, et al., Respondents


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2016, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 14) of Chief Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending that the court dismiss the petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus by petitioner Carlos Bastardo Vale ("Vale") as moot and without prejudice given that Vale has received the relief his petition sought, to wit: an individualized bail hearing before an immigration judge and release from Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody pending completion of his removal proceedings, and it appearing that Vale did not object to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court in agreement with Judge Carlson's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 14) of Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED.

2. Vale's petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as moot and without prejudice.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Vale v. Sabol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 11, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-2249 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Vale v. Sabol

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS BASTARDO VALE, Petitioner v. MARY SABOL, Warden of York County…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-2249 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2016)