From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2011
NO. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH.

May 16, 2011


ORDER


The Special Master filed his Tenth Report on April 21, 2011. (Doc. No. 1647). No objections were filed. The court has considered the report and ADOPTS the Special Master's findings and recommendations in full.

Further, the court HEREBY FINDS that defendants have demonstrated substantial compliance with the following requirements:

• Plaintiffs' counsel has access to the information reasonably necessary to monitor compliance; and • Deputy Commissioners shall not have authority to increase the Return to Custody Assessment at the Probable Cause Hearing. These requirements will therefore no longer be a primary focus of Plaintiffs' or the Special Master's monitoring unless they are inextricably linked with review of the hearing process, the remedial sanctions obligations of the Permanent Injunction, or arise in the course of investigating an individual parolee's situation. These items will remain in this status unless and until it comes to the parties' or the Special Master's attention that there has been a significant decline in compliance. To allow for such attention, defendants SHALL report the status of these requirements to all parties every six months, beginning on January 8, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 13, 2011.


Summaries of

Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2011
NO. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:JERRY VALDIVIA, ALFRED YANCY, and HOSSIE WELCH, on their own behalf and on…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV. S-94-671 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)