From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdivia v. Edge

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 7, 2024
2:22-cv-00247-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00247-LPR

02-07-2024

TOMAS VALE VALDIVIA Reg #33468-018 PLAINTIFF v. C. EDGE, Acting Warden, FCI - Forrest City DEFENDANT


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin. No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the RD and careful consideration of the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.

Doc. 27.

Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this


Summaries of

Valdivia v. Edge

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 7, 2024
2:22-cv-00247-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Valdivia v. Edge

Case Details

Full title:TOMAS VALE VALDIVIA Reg #33468-018 PLAINTIFF v. C. EDGE, Acting Warden…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-00247-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2024)