From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdivia v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 28, 2011
Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH

10-28-2011

JERRY VALDIVIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants.

GEOFFREY THOMAS HOLTZ - 191370 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP DONALD SPECTER - 83925 PRISON LAW OFFICE MICHAEL W. BIEN - 96891 ERNEST GALVAN - 196065 SHIRLEY HUEY - 224114 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP By: Ernest Galvan Attorneys for Plaintiffs HANSON BRIDGETT, LLP By: Renju P. Jacob Attorneys for Defendants


GEOFFREY THOMAS HOLTZ - 191370

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

DONALD SPECTER - 83925

PRISON LAW OFFICE

MICHAEL W. BIEN - 96891

ERNEST GALVAN - 196065

SHIRLEY HUEY - 224114

ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED

ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR SECOND QUARTER, 2011

Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

On July 8, 2004, this Court established procedures by which plaintiffs are to collect periodic attorneys' fees and costs in this case in connection with their work monitoring defendants' compliance with the Court's Orders and collecting fees.

Pursuant to these procedures, plaintiffs sent their Quarterly Statement for the Second Quarter of 2011, covering the period of July 1, 2011 - September 30, 2011 to defendants via overnight Federal Express on July 28, 2011. Defendants submitted their objections to plaintiffs' statement on September 9, 2011. The parties completed their meet and confer on October 4, 2011, and reached an agreement as to most of the hours and all of the costs incurred in this quarter, but not as to the fees relating to Project HOPE ("Flash Incarceration"), Re-Entry Courts, AB 109 and related Criminal Justice Realignment matters, Non-Revocable Parole (NRP), and Plaintiffs' claim to 2011 hourly rates (the "rates dispute").

Pursuant to the July 8, 2004 Order, ¶ 4, the parties will defer and hold in abeyance the dispute over the remaining hours that are not settled through this Stipulation until they are settled or a yearly motion to compel payment is brought following the meet and confer covering the fourth quarter of 2011. The parties will continue to attempt to resolve the rates dispute; any motion regarding plaintiffs' 2011 rates and/or the rates dispute shall be filed no later than sixty days from the end of the meet and confer for the first quarter of 2012 pursuant to ¶ 4 of the July 8, 2004 Order.

Subject to resolution of the rates dispute, the parties agree that $449,337.57 of fees and costs incurred during the Second Quarter of 2011 are undisputed. (A summary of the fees and costs, reflecting the fees at both 2010 and 2011 rates, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.) The undisputed fees are calculated based upon the 2010 rates set forth by Judge Karlton in his September 14, 2011 order. This sum reflects negotiated settlement of certain objections, but does not include remaining disputes over hours relating to Project HOPE ("Flash Incarceration"), Re-Entry Courts, AB 109 and related Criminal Justice Realignment matters, Non-Revocable Parole (NRP), and Plaintiffs' 2011 rates.

WHEREFORE, IT IS CONFIRMED that $449,337.57 plus interest is due and collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP

By: Ernest Galvan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

HANSON BRIDGETT, LLP

By: Renju P. Jacob

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Valdivia v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 28, 2011
Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Valdivia v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JERRY VALDIVIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. Civ. S-94-0671 LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)